ArticleOecologia2026
Climate variability reduces biomass stability in species-rich grasslands, depending on management.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change threatens grassland biomass stability, but combined effects of climate variability and grassland management have rarely been analyzed, constraining our ability to predict management-dependent responses. In a large field experiment in Central Germany, we assessed temporal stability of aboveground biomass and potential underlying mechanisms (dominance, asynchrony, and averaging) in non-fertilized species-rich grasslands over nine years (2015-2023). The grasslands were exposed to ambient or simulated future climate following regional projections (higher temperature and altered seasonal precipitation pattern) and were managed by mowing or sheep grazing. While the future climate treatment showed little effects, high background climate variability increased biomass variability due to lower stabilization by asynchrony and averaging, which was more pronounced in meadows than in pastures. The lower biomass resistance to extreme summer droughts and the higher recovery afterwards in meadows compared to pastures was likely attributable to higher amounts of biomass removed by mowing than by grazing. However, stabilization by the diversity-associated averaging effect, which generally contributed most to biomass stabilization, was lower in pastures compared to meadows at peak biomass production in spring, due to declining species diversity with the lower biomass removal by grazing. Accordingly, we conclude that grassland management with low biomass removal can enhance biomass resistance to climate variability, but this may be offset in the long term by species loss and reduced stabilization through the diversity-associated averaging effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.