ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Perineal Massage for Prevention of Episiotomy and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: An Umbrella Review.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPerineal trauma affects approximately 85% of women delivering vaginally. Episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) carry substantial short- and long-term morbidity. Published systematic reviews on perineal massage reach inconsistent conclusions. The objective of this umbrella review was to synthesize the direction, magnitude, and certainty of the evidence from published systematic reviews evaluating antenatal and intrapartum perineal massage on episiotomy rates and OASIS incidence.
methodsPubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 15 March 2026 for systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRMAs) of randomized controlled trials evaluating perineal massage versus standard care. Primary outcomes were episiotomy rate and OASIS incidence. Methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR-2 and certainty of evidence with GRADE.
resultsEight SRMAs encompassing 1057 to 13,695 women per review were included. Intrapartum (second-stage) massage was consistently associated with reductions in episiotomy rates (relative risk [RR] 0.53-0.71). For OASIS, the two SRMAs reporting relative risks both showed significant reductions (RR 0.49 and 0.52, each with I
conclusionsPublished SRMAs show a consistent direction of effect suggesting that perineal massage may reduce episiotomy rates and severe perineal trauma, although GRADE certainty was low or very low for most outcomes. The synthesis does not support strong recommendations for routine use; clinical application should remain optional and calibrated to the local baseline episiotomy rate and shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42461280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.