Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42461272›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2026

Anticipatory communication about housing, care and end of life in romantic partnerships.

Fiona S Rupprecht, Christina Ristl, Yaeji Kim-Knauss, Jana Nikitin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona S RupprechtDepartment of Psychology, University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829, Landau (Palatinate), Germany. fiona.rupprecht@rptu.de.
Christina RistlFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Yaeji Kim-KnaussInstitute of Psychogerontology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Kobergerstr. 62, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany.
Jana NikitinFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication about housing, care, and end of life often happens in reaction to, rather than in anticipation of, critical life periods. As such, it is mostly studied in critical situations and clinical contexts, although anticipatory and repeated communication in close relationships may come with unique benefits.

objectiveWe aimed at providing a better understanding of the frequency of anticipatory communication about housing, care, and end of life in romantic partnerships and its immediate behavioral, cognitive, and affective benefits. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study, 118 individuals, among them 55 couples, aged 63 years on average were surveyed on their anticipatory communication, preparatory behavior, feelings of preparedness, and topic-specific anxiety via questionnaires. For analyses, we applied multilevel modeling.

resultsAnticipatory communication happened rarely but was associated with behavioral, cognitive, and affective benefits. More frequent communication about housing was most strongly associated with preparatory behavior. More frequent communication about the end of life was most strongly associated with feelings of preparedness and reduced anxiety.

conclusionThe context of the romantic relationship is particularly promising for anticipatory communication. Anticipatory communication should be enabled and supported.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCommunicationInterpersonal RelationsTerminal CareAgedAnxietyFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdvance care planningAging preparationAnxietyPlanning for the futurePreparatory behavior

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.