Observational studyCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2026
Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease Across Complex and High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Risk Categories: A Multicenter Registry Study.
Observational study in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Drug-coated Balloon Treatment in de Novo Coronary Lesion
Platelet Function and genoType-Related Long-term progGosis in DES-treated Patients : A Consortium From Multi-centered Registries
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease Across Complex and High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Risk Categories: A Multicenter Registry Study.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence regarding the risk-stratified effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB)-based PCI for de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited, particularly in patients undergoing complex and high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP PCI).
aimsTo compare the efficacy and safety of DCB-based PCI versus DES-only PCI for de novo CAD across CHIP risk categories.
methodsPatients treated with DCB alone or with a hybrid DCB/drug-eluting stent (DES) strategy between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed (DCB-based group). The comparator group included patients treated exclusively with second-generation DES from a Korean multicenter registry. The primary endpoint was the 2-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion thrombosis, and major bleeding.
resultsTotal 2022 propensity score-matched pairs were stratified by CHIP score into low (0-2; 1660 pairs), intermediate (3-4; 304 pairs), and high (≥ 5; 91 pairs) risk groups. DCB-only treatment accounted for 70.8% of the DCB-based group, with hybrid approaches more frequent in higher-risk patients. Two-year MACE rates increased with CHIP risk in both groups, but remained consistently lower in the DCB-based group: 5.3%, 6.3%, and 20.0% versus 10.9%, 16.9%, and 31.2% for DES-only PCI (log-rank p < 0.001). DCB-based PCI was associated with lower MACE risk across all CHIP categories (all p < 0.05), with no significant interaction (p-interaction = 0.819). TVR reduction was significant in the low-to-intermediate risk (p-interaction = 0.056), and major bleeding declined with increasing CHIP risk, most notably in the high-risk group (p-interaction = 0.044).
conclusionsDCB-based PCI was associated with significantly lower 2-year MACE rates across all CHIP risk categories and may offer a potential alternative to DES-only strategies in selective patients. Clinical trial registration number REAL-DCB registry (NCT04619277), PTRG-DES registry (NCT04734028).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.