ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2026
The natural history of a biocrust architect, the cyanobacterium Microcoleus vaginatus.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The filamentous cyanobacterium Microcoleus vaginatus is a pioneer soil colonizer and the most important microorganism for the formation of cyanobacterial biological soil crusts (or biocrusts), biofilm-like communities developing on soil surfaces exposed to light that become prominent in arid and polar lands. Among the most abundant cyanobacteria by global biomass, it contributes significantly through its biocrust-building to the global terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycles. Locally, it contributes to the fertility and stability against erosion of the soils it inhabits and has become an indispensable tool in arid soil restoration efforts. Despite its importance, it remains relatively understudied. Because most work has been descriptive and ecological in nature, the knowledge amassed could be called a natural history. We provide an integrative review of what is known about its biology, what is not, and what is hindering advancement. We touch on its evolutionary history and population genetics, its physiological, genetic (genomic), behavioral, and ecological capacities, including some that present apparent paradoxes. We also explore the consequential relationships it keeps with other microbes, both mutualistic and antagonistic. The different aspects are guided by a dual leitmotiv to facilitate the understanding of its ecological success and environmental impact, and to predict its fate in a changing world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.