Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460951›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2026

Shared Decision Making on Methylphenidate in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and ADHD in a Young Athlete.

Aleksandra Rechcińska, Tomasz Rechciński

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandra RechcińskaCentral Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. Electronic address: a.rechcinska@gmail.com.
Tomasz RechcińskiDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, The Biegański Hospital, Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise is not categorically contraindicated in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but concerns remain regarding sympathomimetic agents in patients with structural heart disease. CASE SUMMARY: A 26-year-old man with HCM, diagnosed at age 16, was referred for assessment of methylphenidate safety for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and social anxiety treated with paroxetine. Cardiac imaging over 10 years showed stable septal hypertrophy with preserved systolic function and no high-risk features. Electrocardiogram showed left ventricular hypertrophy and repolarization abnormalities; QT dispersion was 74 ms, below high-risk thresholds in HCM cohorts. After counseling on arrhythmic risk and possible electrocardiogram surveillance, the patient declined methylphenidate and chose psychotherapy-based ADHD management while continuing exercise. DISCUSSION: This case shows how limited evidence on stimulant-related arrhythmic risk in low-risk HCM necessitates individualized assessment. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Shared decision making can align ADHD treatment with arrhythmic risk in HCM. Even when stimulants appear acceptable, patients may choose nonpharmacological ADHD strategies.

Indexed as

ADHDhypertrophic cardiomyopathymethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID42460951
PMCPMC13379862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.