Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460933›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2026

Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Master's Athlete and No Modifiable Risk: Gaps in Return-to-Play Guidance.

Kaitlyn E McSurdy, Aryan Aiyer

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaitlyn E McSurdyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: mcsurdyk@upmc.edu.
Aryan AiyerUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in master's athletes. Current return-to-competition guidelines recommend cardiac rehabilitation and risk factor modification, but do not address athletes lacking modifiable risk factors or revascularization options. CASE SUMMARY: A 46-year-old male competitive runner developed ACS from plaque rupture following a marathon. Stenting was deferred due to malapposition risk with large-caliber coronaries. He completed cardiac rehabilitation and was cleared to return to competition at 6 months. WHY BEYOND THE GUIDELINES?: This patient had no modifiable risk factors and was not a candidate for revascularization, leaving his pre- and postevent cardiovascular risk unchanged despite meeting guideline criteria for return to competition. DISCUSSION: Conventional risk stratification tools, including risk calculators and coronary calcium scoring, are less accurate in master's athletes, creating a gap in counseling unrevascularized patients. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Master's athletes with ACS, no modifiable risk factors, and unrevascularized lesions require improved risk stratification tools and further research to guide return-to-competition counseling.

Indexed as

atherosclerosiscardiac riskcoronary angiographycoronary calcium scoreexercisemyocardial infarctionmyocardial ischemiasecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID42460933
PMCPMC13379868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.