ArticleChild and adolescent mental health2026
Debate: Conversational AI and young people's mental health - friend or foe? - conversational AI and young people's mental health: the case for clinically informed design.
Article in Child and adolescent mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conversational AI is increasingly being used by young people for emotional support, advice and conversations about personal concerns. Emerging evidence suggests that these systems may offer mental health benefits, particularly for depressive symptoms, while also raising concerns about dependency, relational dynamics, safety and therapeutic precision. This debate article argues that the central question is not whether conversational AI should be viewed as beneficial or harmful, or as therapeutic or nontherapeutic. Rather, its impact on young people's mental health may depend substantially on how these systems are designed. As the boundaries between clinically oriented and general-purpose conversational agents become increasingly blurred, design decisions concerning relational style, responses to distress, risk management, transparency and human oversight take on growing importance. These decisions are clinical and developmental as much as technical. The article argues that mental health expertise has an important role to play in shaping, evaluating and governing conversational AI systems, particularly as they become more embedded in the everyday lives of young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.