ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
From Ambition to Action: Barriers and Enablers for the Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework and the Role of Non-State Bridge Organizations.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF), adopted in 2022, set forth ambitious targets to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. However, translating these commitments into actionable strategies has proven challenging due to several factors. These include insufficient financing of biodiversity initiatives, lack of capacity and institutional coordination at the national and subnational level, fragmented implementation of the framework, limited integration of biodiversity into sectoral policies (agriculture and infrastructure, etc.), and gaps in monitoring, reporting, and accounting mechanisms. Moreover, geopolitical tension and uneven commitments among parties have further slowed collective progress. The 16th Conference of the Parties (COP16) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was aimed at addressing these challenges. This paper analyzes the key outcomes of COP16, focusing on resource mobilization, monitoring frameworks, and the role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). Building on institutional experience from the China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation (CBCGDF), this Perspective highlights the important role that accompanying organizations and civil society can play in strengthening biodiversity governance. By synthesizing lessons from COP16 and identifying practical pathways for improving implementation, monitoring, financing, and inclusive participation, the paper offers recommendations that not only support delivery of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) but also help inform policy discussions and implementation priorities in the lead-up to COP17.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.