ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2026
Development and application of a hydraulic performance evaluation method for denitrification reactors.
Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hydraulic characteristics of denitrification reactors are crucial for their efficient and stable operation. The absence of a quantitative assessment framework for reactor flow field structures hinders the establishment of a clear relationship between hydrodynamic conditions and denitrification performance, limiting wastewater treatment optimization. This study proposes a hydraulic performance evaluation method based on cross-sectional velocity distribution uniformity. By integrating computational fluid dynamics simulations with physical experimental validation, the internal flow characteristics of three reactor configurations with different water distributors - spiral flow reactor (SFR), upflow reactor (UFR), and downflow reactor (DFR) - were systematically analyzed. The results demonstrated that the SFR consistently formed a stable three-dimensional spiral flow pattern, exhibiting significantly higher velocity distribution uniformity in the 0.3-0.75 m core reaction zone compared with the UFR and DFR, thereby effectively mitigating short-circuiting and dead zones. All three reactors achieved optimal uniformity at a flow rate of 20 L/min, indicating the existence of an optimal operational condition. Robustness analysis confirmed that the proposed uniformity evaluation method was minimally influenced by the number and arrangement of monitoring points, with the coefficient of variation remaining below 14% under all tested conditions, demonstrating the method's strong stability and practical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42460565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.