ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Residents' preference trade-offs for critical illness insurance scheme design: a discrete choice experiment in Shandong Province, China.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The economic burden of disease remains a significant global public health challenge. In China, the critical illness insurance scheme is a pivotal policy designed to protect households from catastrophic health expenditure. However, evidence on residents' preferences for this insurance is limited. Identifying these preferences is essential for advancing resident-centered policy reform. To address this gap, we conducted a discrete choice experiment to quantify public preferences for critical illness insurance attributes among residents in Shandong Province, China. Through literature review, qualitative interviews, and expert consultation, we designed a discrete choice experiment with six policy attributes: cost, reimbursement ratio, deductible, annual reimbursement limit, scope of reimbursable expenses, and restriction to designated hospitals. An orthogonal design generated choice sets. Data were collected from 360 residents across 3 cities in Shandong Province and analyzed using mixed logit and latent class models. Latent class analysis identified preference heterogeneity across subgroups. Based on model results, we calculated relative importance scores and simulated selection probabilities. A total of 334 valid questionnaires were collected (46.4% male; 53.6% female). Mixed logit analysis identified the reimbursement ratio (32.73%) as the most important attribute, followed by the annual reimbursement limit (23.81%) and scope of reimbursable expenses (23.10%). Latent class analysis revealed two subgroups: a "Coverage-Intensity Sensitive" Group (Class 1, n = 125) and a "Reimbursement-Focused Group" (Class 2, n = 209). Class 1 prioritized high reimbursement limits (68.3% relative importance), preferring no annual limit. Class 2 emphasized optimizing the reimbursement ratio (45.6%) and hospital flexibility, while accepting higher deductibles. Policymakers should prioritize increasing reimbursement rates and expanding coverage scope, with appropriate premium adjustments. Aligning critical illness insurance design with residents' heterogeneous preferences contributes to more targeted and efficient policy arrangement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.