ArticleComputational brain & behavior2024
Modeling Time Cell Neuron-Level Dynamics.
Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timing of intervals in both humans and nonhuman animals is susceptible to imprecision, leading to trial-to-trial variations in timed behaviors. A notable statistical characteristic of this timing behavior is the linear increase in the standard deviation of timed responses as the intervals become longer, known as time-scale invariance. Although the exact mechanism responsible for this property is not yet fully understood, "time cells" have emerged as a potential mechanism, particularly in relation to interval timing within the episodic memory system. These specialized networks of neurons exhibit sequential firing, with each neuron becoming active during a specific phase of the timed experiment. Notably, the resulting "ramping wave" decelerates during later phases of the timed event, and the duration of cell activity increases over time. In this paper, we propose a new model of a biological neural network composed of time cells, utilizing integrate-and-fire neurons with slow after-hyperpolarization currents and varying resting membrane potentials. This proposed network does not rely on any specific network architecture apart from self-excitation. Remarkably, the network successfully reproduces the experimentally observed ramping activity, with the standard deviation of spike times among the participating neurons increasing linearly with the average spike time. Furthermore, the results of the model are consistent with the experimental findings, providing additional evidence for its accuracy and validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.