Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460435›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2024

Bayesian Graphical Modeling with the Circular Drift Diffusion Model.

Manuel Villarreal, Adriana F Chávez De la Peña, Percy K Mistry, Vinod Menon, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Michael D Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manuel VillarrealDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-5100 USA.
Adriana F Chávez De la PeñaDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-5100 USA.
Percy K MistryDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Vinod MenonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Joachim VandekerckhoveDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-5100 USA.
Michael D LeeDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-5100 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circular drift-diffusion model (CDDM) is a sequential sampling model designed to account for decisions and response times in decision-making tasks with a circular set of choice alternatives. We present and demonstrate a fully Bayesian implementation and extension of the CDDM. This development allows researchers to apply the CDDM to data from complex experiments and draw conclusions about targeted hypotheses. The Bayesian implementation relies on a custom JAGS module. We describe the module and demonstrate its adequacy through a simulation study. We then illustrate the advantages of the implementation by revisiting data from a continuous orientation judgment task. We develop a graphical model for the analysis that is based on the CDDM but extends it with hierarchical and latent-mixture structures. We then demonstrate how these extensions are used to accommodate the design of the experiment and to implement psychological assumptions about individual differences, the difficulty of different stimulus conditions, and the impact of cues on decision making. Finally, we demonstrate how the computational Bayesian inference enabled by JAGS allows these assumptions to be tested and addresses psychological research questions about people's decision making.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceCircular drift diffusion modelHierarchical modelJAGSLatent-mixture models

Identifiers

PMID42460435
PMCPMC13298652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.