ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Prediction of meningioma shrinkage after cyproterone acetate cessation.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Progestin-induced meningiomas may stabilize or regress after discontinuation of cyproterone acetate (CPA), but the determinants of this volumetric response remain unclear. Identifying predictors of tumor shrinkage could improve patient management and prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the longitudinal volumetric evolution of 137 meningiomas diagnosed during ongoing CPA treatment in 52 consecutive patients. Tumor volumes were measured from all available imaging studies. Four mathematical models (linear, exponential, power, and the Gompertz) were compared to describe tumor growth trajectories. Response patterns were derived from the Gompertz modeling. Predictive models were constructed using random forests, with leave-one-out cross-validation. Baseline clinical and radiological variables, as well as early volumetric response at 3 months, were evaluated as predictors. Results: The Gompertz model best described tumor volume evolution. Three patterns of tumor response after CPA withdrawal were identified: response with low limit volume (47%), response with high limit volume (41%), and non-response (12%). At the patient level, analogous clusters were found: low limit response (22%), high limit response (64%), and non-response (14%). Random forest models predicted cluster membership with error rates of 24.8% at the tumor level and 23.1% at the patient level. The most informative predictors were initial tumor burden and patient age at CPA exposure and withdrawal. Incorporating early volumetric response at 3 months reduced the prediction error to 9.5% for tumors and 3.8% for patients. Conclusions: Tumor burden and age at CPA exposure are major predictors of meningioma shrinkage after treatment discontinuation. Early volumetric changes provide additional prognostic value and significantly improve predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.