Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460405›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2025

Agent-Based Behavioral Modeling of Human Associative Learning in a Complex Approach-Avoidance Conflict Task.

Franziska Usée, Sebastian Schmidt, Christiane A Melzig, Dirk Ostwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franziska UséeClinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology, and Psychotherapy, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 29a, Marburg, 35032 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-2000
Sebastian SchmidtClinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology, and Psychotherapy, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 29a, Marburg, 35032 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-797X
Christiane A Melzig *Clinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology, and Psychotherapy, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 29a, Marburg, 35032 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6047-6658
Dirk Ostwald *Institute of Psychology, Otto von Guericke University, Universitätsplatz 2, Magdeburg, 39106 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3530-1845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its key role in the development, maintenance, and treatment of anxiety disorders, the detailed mechanisms of human avoidance learning remain elusive. To contribute to the understanding of avoidance learning, we here report on a novel approach-avoidance conflict task that requires participants to learn associations between complex visual stimuli and combined appetitive and aversive stimuli while actively engaging with the experimental environment. Using an agent-based behavioral modeling approach, we implemented and validated an extensive set of control, heuristic, Rescorla-Wagner learning-based, and hybrid agents. We show that a Rescorla-Wagner learning-based agent with a prior expectation bias parameter best explains the learning behavior of 50 participants. As such, our work complements current research on the computational underpinnings of approach-avoidance behavior by showing paradigm and task instruction dependencies in approach-avoidance-relevant associative learning and contributes to the overall aim of achieving a more fine-grained understanding of the etiology of anxiety disorders.

Indexed as

Agent-based behavioral modelingAnxietyApproach-avoidance behaviorRescorla-Wagner learning

Identifiers

PMID42460405
PMCPMC13298691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.