ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Identification of Contacts With High Rates of Missed and Asymptomatic Infection Following an Outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease: A Seroepidemiological Study in Likati Health Zone, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ebola virus disease (EVD) is often regarded as severe and highly fatal, but growing evidence suggests that subclinical or minimally symptomatic infections occur and frequently go undetected. During the 2017 outbreak in Likati Health Zone, only 8 cases were confirmed despite many reported exposures. We evaluated the extent of asymptomatic or unrecognized Ebola virus infection and associated factors among contacts of reported cases. Methods: In November 2017, we conducted a cross-sectional community-based serosurvey among contacts originally identified through Ministry of Health records and newly identified through additional post-outbreak investigations. Participants provided blood samples and completed questionnaires on demographics, exposures, and symptoms within 4 weeks of symptom onset of the EVD case with whom contact was reported. Sera were tested for anti-EBOV nucleoprotein IgG by ELISA. Seropositive individuals were classified as asymptomatic (no symptoms) or unrecognized (≥1 symptom). Secondary attack rate (SAR) was estimated, and logistic regression assessed associations with sociodemographic factors, exposure level, and symptoms. Results: Among 180 participants (79 originally identified; 101 newly identified), 33 (18.3%) were seropositive. Of these, 19 (58%) reported symptoms, and 14 (42%) were asymptomatic. Any EVD-related symptom was associated with higher odds of seropositivity (OR 2.48, Conclusions: Asymptomatic infections occurred, including among contacts missed during the response, highlighting the need for exposure-based serologic assessments in EVD investigations and raising questions about immune responses and the true disease burden in outbreak-affected settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.