ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
Extraction of brainprint by means of autoencoder with attention mechanism.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) signals provide a unique opportunity for personal identification due to their inherent permanence and uniqueness. However, EEG data are complex, multidimensional, non-stationary, and time-dependent, making feature extraction and classification particularly challenging. This study proposes a framework by integrating autoencoder-based feature extraction with self-attention mechanism for EEG-based personal identification utilizing the proposed EEG data cube spatio-temporal stream representation. Three types of stimuli were applied: auditory, cognitive, and resting state. EEG data were collected in-house from college students in two sessions separated by 10 days. A longitudinal design was employed, with Session-1 data used for training and Session-2 data for testing, ensuring robustness against inter-session variability. Extracted features were subsequently classified using Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Random Forests (RF). SVM achieved accuracy scores 97.62% when identifying two subject, 82.54% when identifying five subjects and 62.90% when identifying seven subjects using the resting state neural patterns. This research highlights the feasibility of using deep learning networks strengthened with a self-attention mechanism for advancing biometric identification through EEG signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.