Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460385›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Vision-based vs. IMU-based upper-limb pose estimation in assisted dressing: a comparative study of positional accuracy and kinematic fidelity.

Yasmin Rafiq, Shenglin Wang, Mohammed Al-Nuaimi, Lyudmila Mihaylova, Robert M Hierons, Sanja Dogramadzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasmin RafiqDepartment Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Shenglin WangSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Mohammed Al-NuaimiSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Lyudmila MihaylovaSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Robert M HieronsSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Sanja DogramadziSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimation of upper-limb kinematics is essential for applications such as rehabilitation assessment and assistive robotics, yet remains challenging in real-world scenarios involving occlusion and physical human interaction. While vision-based pose estimation methods have advanced significantly, their ability to recover reliable joint kinematics under such conditions remains unclear. This paper presents a systematic comparison of vision-based and wearable sensing approaches for upper-limb pose estimation during assisted dressing tasks. A monocular RGB-based convolutional neural network (CNN) and a temporally smoothed variant (CNN_temporal) are evaluated alongside a wearable IMU-based reconstruction method. All approaches are compared against an inverse kinematics (IK) reference derived from VICON motion capture data using participant-specific kinematic models. Performance is assessed using both positional error, measured via global and shoulder-centred mean per-joint position error (MPJPE), and kinematic agreement, measured via elbow flexion/extension angle error. Experiments on a real-world dataset of assisted dressing trials, involving an occupational therapist and three participants, demonstrate that IMU-based estimation provides consistently accurate and stable joint-angle reconstruction (e.g.,

Indexed as

assisted dressingconvolutional neural networks (CNN)human motion captureinertial measurement units (IMU)inverse kinematicsocclusion handlingpose estimationupper-limb kinematics

Identifiers

PMID42460385
PMCPMC13368569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.