In one paragraphArticle in PhytoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
8 authors.
Morgan VaughnDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH 43015, USA Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America https://ror.org/01pp8nd67.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8498-8517 Dekon HarperDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH 43015, USA Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America https://ror.org/01pp8nd67.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7164-9829 Lexi ReiterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH 43015, USA Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America https://ror.org/01pp8nd67.
Elizabeth DoddsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH 43015, USA Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America https://ror.org/01pp8nd67.
Nancy A MurrayDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH 43015, USA Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America https://ror.org/01pp8nd67.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4076-6169 Keegan FloydDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH 43015, USA Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America https://ror.org/01pp8nd67.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0546-3255 David M JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH 43015, USA Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America https://ror.org/01pp8nd67.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-7419 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
A new cauliflorous species of the pantropical genus
Indexed as
Bet-hedgingdispersalkeyLate MioceneNeotropicsphylogenypollinatorsXylopia XY-peruviana clade
Identifiers
PMID42460375
PMCPMC13370152
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390