ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Missed isochromatic cardiac pulsation in remote photoplethysmography: detection, impact, and removal.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Missed isochromatic cardiac pulsation in remote photoplethysmography: detection, impact, and removal.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) extracts the cardiac pulse from facial video by isolating chromatic variation due to wavelength-dependent hemoglobin absorption. We report that this signal model is incomplete. A second cardiac-frequency signal is present in skin video: an isochromatic pulsation along the skin's mean reflectance direction, arising from ballistocardiographic modulation of skin surface geometry and changes in the effective scattering cross-section of the dermal vascular bed. This isochromatic component is conflated with the chromatic signal by every rPPG method we evaluated, including chrominance-based methods (POS, CHROM) and other projection or decomposition methods (OMIT, LGI, PBV, ICA). The two signals share the cardiac frequency but differ in phase and signal fidelity, and their relative directions vary with skin tone, lighting, and recording conditions. To assess whether the isochromatic component contributes significant error to rPPG, we constructed chrominance Phase-Aware Cardiac Eigenprojection (cPACE), a method that removes the isochromatic direction via a subject-adaptive projection orthogonal to the measured skin reflectance before extracting the cardiac signal through eigen-vector projection. Across UBFC-Phys (rest and speech) and the CMU-rPPG India and Sierra Leone cohorts, cross-ROI phase-locking values of the recovered signal are systematically higher under cPACE than under any other method evaluated, indicating cleaner waveform recovery. The resulting heart rate estimates achieve mean absolute error of 1.7, 3.7, 1.7, and 1.1 BPM, respectively, on these cohorts, compared to 2.8, 9.5, 16.8, and 17.8 BPM for POS with homodyne envelope correction applied for parity. Together, these results show that the isochromatic component is a major source of error in existing rPPG methods, and future methods should explicitly account for it.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.