Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460345›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2026

Retinal layer segmentation in OCT images with a 2.5D cross-slice feature fusion module for glaucoma assessment.

Hyunwoo Kim, Heesuk Kim, Chaewon Lee, Wungrak Choi, Jae-Sang Hyun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyunwoo KimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Heesuk KimInstitute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Chaewon LeeYonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Wungrak ChoiInstitute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Sang HyunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-8243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For accurate glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring, reliable retinal layer segmentation in OCT images is essential. However, existing 2D segmentation methods often suffer from slice-to-slice inconsistencies due to the lack of contextual information across adjacent B-scans. 3D segmentation methods are better for capturing slice-to-slice context, but they require expensive computational resources. To address these limitations, we propose a 2.5D segmentation framework that incorporates a novel cross-slice feature fusion (CFF) module into a U-Net-like architecture. The CFF module fuses inter-slice features to effectively capture contextual information, enabling consistent boundary detection across slices and improved robustness in noisy regions. The framework was validated on both a clinical dataset and the publicly available DUKE DME dataset. Compared to other segmentation methods without the CFF module, the proposed method achieved an 8.56% reduction in mean absolute distance and a 13.92% reduction in root mean square error, demonstrating improved segmentation accuracy and robustness. Overall, the proposed 2.5D framework balances contextual awareness and computational efficiency, enabling anatomically reliable retinal layer delineation for automated glaucoma evaluation and potential clinical applications.

Identifiers

PMID42460345
PMCPMC13372341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.