ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Retinal layer segmentation in OCT images with a 2.5D cross-slice feature fusion module for glaucoma assessment.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For accurate glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring, reliable retinal layer segmentation in OCT images is essential. However, existing 2D segmentation methods often suffer from slice-to-slice inconsistencies due to the lack of contextual information across adjacent B-scans. 3D segmentation methods are better for capturing slice-to-slice context, but they require expensive computational resources. To address these limitations, we propose a 2.5D segmentation framework that incorporates a novel cross-slice feature fusion (CFF) module into a U-Net-like architecture. The CFF module fuses inter-slice features to effectively capture contextual information, enabling consistent boundary detection across slices and improved robustness in noisy regions. The framework was validated on both a clinical dataset and the publicly available DUKE DME dataset. Compared to other segmentation methods without the CFF module, the proposed method achieved an 8.56% reduction in mean absolute distance and a 13.92% reduction in root mean square error, demonstrating improved segmentation accuracy and robustness. Overall, the proposed 2.5D framework balances contextual awareness and computational efficiency, enabling anatomically reliable retinal layer delineation for automated glaucoma evaluation and potential clinical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.