ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Computational validation of optical adaptive depth steering for continuous-wave fNIRS.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous-wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy (CW-fNIRS) traditionally utilizes fixed-geometry optode configurations, which introduce significant anatomical bias due to inter-subject variations in skull thickness and phenotypic barriers such as dense hair. To address these limitations, we propose an Optical Adaptive Depth Steering (O-ADS) framework that mathematically synthesizes a "Virtual Optode" using a high-density multi-distance array (8-32 mm) and a linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) spatial beamformer. We computationally validated this framework using high-fidelity Monte Carlo simulations on layered cranial slabs and a 3D anatomical atlas (Colin27). Results demonstrate that O-ADS exhibits high computational resilience to anatomical bias, achieving up to a 39-fold improvement in relative brain sensitivity for thick-skull morphologies compared to traditional 32 mm static sensors. Furthermore, under realistic spatiotemporal noise conditions involving heterogeneous scalp hemodynamics and simulated phenotypic barriers (8 mm reference channel failure), O-ADS maintained a significantly higher mean signal recovery purity (38.3% ± 22.1%) than standard Multi-Distance Regression (MDR) (21.8% ± 15.4%). This software-defined approach provides a scalable solution for optical neuroimaging, reducing the dependence of sensor performance on individual anatomical and phenotypic variance to facilitate more inclusive cerebral monitoring under challenging physical constraints.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.