ArticleDusunen adam : Bakirkoy Ruh ve Sinir Hastaliklari Hastanesi yayin organi2024
Reliability and validity study of the Turkish form of the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS-TR).
Article in Dusunen adam : Bakirkoy Ruh ve Sinir Hastaliklari Hastanesi yayin organi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Anhedonia, characterized by a diminished capacity to experience pleasure, is a transdiagnostic concept observed across various neuropsychiatric conditions. It can be categorized into two domains based on the timing of pleasurable events: in-the-moment (consummatory) pleasure and anticipatory pleasure. The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) assesses these temporal aspects of pleasure. Having received a global response, it has been translated into many languages. This study aims to adapt and validate the TEPS for Turkish use (TEPS-TR). Method: Data were collected from 222 university students using convenience sampling, following ethical approval. The translated TEPS underwent reliability and validity analyses to assess its applicability and consistency. A set of measures assessing different aspects of anhedonia and apathy was co-administered to evaluate the scale's concurrent validity. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient for the 15-item TEPS-TR was 0.823 for the full scale, 0.767 for the anticipatory subscale, and 0.746 for the consummatory subscale. Principal component analyses yielded three factors, explaining 48.87% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis, performed to evaluate the construct validity of the TEPS-TR, indicated an acceptable fit. The total and subscale scores of the TEPS-TR significantly correlated to varying degrees with all scales included in the analysis, except for the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Conclusion: The findings indicate that the TEPS-TR exhibits good reliability and validity in assessing anhedonia. However, further exploration into the distinct elements of anticipatory and consummatory pleasure within clinical populations is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.