ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
From rhetoric to representation: athlete-centred governance understood, constructed, and enacted in a mega-sport event.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From rhetoric to reality: an empirical audit of athlete-centred governance in the Toronto 2015 Pan/Parapan American games.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While athlete-centredness is increasingly championed globally by sport organizations, the concept remains vaguely defined and inconsistently operationalized. This creates a systemic gap between rhetoric and the enactment of athlete voice in mega-sports events (MSEs) planning. Despite increasing emphasis on athlete-centred governance, limited empirical research has examined how athlete influence is operationalized within governance structures. This study examines how athlete-centred governance was understood, constructed, and enacted through Athlete Advisory Council (AAC) processes over time (2011-2015) in the Toronto 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games. Drawing on a qualitative case study design, the research utilizes interpretive process tracing and documentary analysis of organizational documents. The study employs the stakeholder identification and salience model to analyze the influence of athletes through power, legitimacy, and urgency. Reflexivity was employed to leverage the lead researcher's positionality as the former AAC vice-chair while maintaining analytical rigor. The findings reveal a five-phase lifecycle of athlete-centred governance. Results demonstrate that athlete-centred governance operated through embedded epistemic influence and structured operational integration rather than formal redistribution of decision-making power. Athlete legitimacy and urgency expanded through sustained horizontal and vertical integration while institutional authority remained centralized. Rather than functioning solely as symbolic representation, formal inclusion enabled athletes to contribute meaningfully to feasibility discussions, organizational planning, and operational delivery despite constrained formal authority. These findings position athlete-centred governance as a form of bounded empowerment in which influence is exercised relationally, operationally, and epistemically rather than primarily through formal voting power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.