Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460255›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2026

Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pelvic pain in women: a systematic review.

Gianpaolo Ronconi, Rossella Calciano, Giuseppe Gullo, Antonella Vitale, Eliana Rampulla, Alberto Cutaia, Augusto Fusco, Elisabetta Lama, Eleonora Conti, Valentina Billone and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gianpaolo RonconiFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Department of Geriatrics, Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, Rome, Italy.
Rossella CalcianoFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Department of Geriatrics, Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe GulloAOOR Villa Sofia Cervello, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Antonella VitaleUniversity Department of Geriatric and Orthopaedic Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Eliana RampullaPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Alberto CutaiaUniversity Department of Geriatric and Orthopaedic Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Augusto FuscoUOSD High-Intensity Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, Sensory Organs and Thorax, University Hospital Foundation "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta LamaUniversity Department of Geriatric and Orthopaedic Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora ContiAOOR Villa Sofia Cervello, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Valentina BilloneAOOR Villa Sofia Cervello, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Paola Emilia FerraraFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Department of Geriatrics, Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects approximately 26% of women and significantly impacts quality of life. Common causes include dysmenorrhea and pelvic floor dysfunction. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely used for pain relief to inhibit pain transmission and stimulate endogenous opioid release. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of TENS in the rehabilitation of pelvic pain in women through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases using the terms "transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation", "pelvic pain", and "pelvic floor", selecting RCTs published between 2020 and 2025. Inclusion criteria followed the PICO framework, targeting adult women with CPP and TENS as the intervention. Studies involving males, pregnancy, or without full texts were excluded. PRISMA guidelines were followed; study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria; they involved 281 participants. Three studies focused on primary dysmenorrhea (PD) and one on vestibulodynia. All studies reported a significant reduction in pain following TENS treatment, assessed by the visual analogue scale or numeric rating scale, with some studies also noting reduced analgesic consumption. However, improvements in secondary outcomes such as sexual function and pelvic floor muscle strength were inconsistent. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation appears to be an effective, safe, and non-invasive modality for reducing pelvic pain in women, especially in cases of PD and vestibulodynia. Evidence remains limited by heterogeneity in study protocols and outcome measures. Further high-quality RCTs are needed for standardized protocols and broader rehabilitative outcomes, including functional and quality-of-life improvements.

Indexed as

dysmenorrheapelvic floor disorderspelvic painrehabilitationtranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42460255
PMCPMC13371684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.