ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2026
Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pelvic pain in women: a systematic review.
Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects approximately 26% of women and significantly impacts quality of life. Common causes include dysmenorrhea and pelvic floor dysfunction. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely used for pain relief to inhibit pain transmission and stimulate endogenous opioid release. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of TENS in the rehabilitation of pelvic pain in women through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases using the terms "transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation", "pelvic pain", and "pelvic floor", selecting RCTs published between 2020 and 2025. Inclusion criteria followed the PICO framework, targeting adult women with CPP and TENS as the intervention. Studies involving males, pregnancy, or without full texts were excluded. PRISMA guidelines were followed; study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria; they involved 281 participants. Three studies focused on primary dysmenorrhea (PD) and one on vestibulodynia. All studies reported a significant reduction in pain following TENS treatment, assessed by the visual analogue scale or numeric rating scale, with some studies also noting reduced analgesic consumption. However, improvements in secondary outcomes such as sexual function and pelvic floor muscle strength were inconsistent. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation appears to be an effective, safe, and non-invasive modality for reducing pelvic pain in women, especially in cases of PD and vestibulodynia. Evidence remains limited by heterogeneity in study protocols and outcome measures. Further high-quality RCTs are needed for standardized protocols and broader rehabilitative outcomes, including functional and quality-of-life improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.