ReviewHealth science reports2026
Wearable Electronic Devices for Alzheimer's Disease Care: A Systematic Review of Applications, Benefits, and Challenges.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline, behavioral disturbances, and loss of functional independence. As the global prevalence of AD continues to rise, traditional episodic care models are increasingly inadequate for providing continuous and individualized support. Wearable electronic devices offer a potential alternative by enabling non-invasive, real-time monitoring in everyday settings. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on the applications, reported outcomes, and implementation challenges of wearable and wearable-adjacent technologies in AD care. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in September 2025 across five databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, using keywords and MeSH terms related to wearable electronic devices, smart glasses, smartwatches, and Alzheimer's disease. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251158703). Two independent reviewers screened records and extracted data in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Methodological quality was assessed using a validated 10-item appraisal tool. Results: Of 1399 identified records, ten studies met the eligibility criteria. For structured synthesis, the included technologies were organized into four architectural categories: body area network-based sensor systems, augmented reality smart glasses, hybrid wearable-mobile platforms, and wearable-adjacent assistive technologies. Across studies, the included technologies were applied to physiological monitoring, mobility and gait assessment, cognitive and spatial support, and caregiver communication. Findings suggest preliminary feasibility across these domains; however, small sample sizes, heterogeneous outcome measures, and predominantly early-phase study designs limit the strength of available evidence. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that wearable and wearable-adjacent technologies may contribute to multiple aspects of AD care, particularly in home-based settings. Translation into routine practice requires prospective, adequately powered studies with standardized outcome frameworks, alongside regulatory alignment and patient-caregiver co-design to address persistent usability barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.