ArticleCureus2026
Automated Surveillance of Ventilator-Associated Events and Mortality Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in Japan.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Using in-house automated surveillance of ventilator-associated events (VAE) from our electronic health record (EHR) system, we investigated clinical and microbiological factors associated with mortality among patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). Our primary objective was to identify risk factors for mortality in patients during MV. Our secondary objectives included assessing the impact of COVID-19 and examining any seasonal variations in mortality during MV. Methods All patients who received MV between 2013 and 2025 were included. The internal review board approved the study as a retrospective analysis in 2026. We defined cold seasons as October through March. Using a straightforward VAE calculator in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidelines, the primary outcome was all-cause mortality during MV. We excluded deaths after extubation to study patients undergoing MV alone. Patients with missing data due to historical changes in documentation were analyzed collectively in a subgroup analysis. Results A total of 17,881 ventilator days were recorded among 2,003 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that significant risk factors for mortality included age ≥ 75 (odds ratio [OR] 1.343, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.006-1.792, P = 0.045) and the presence of ventilator-associated conditions (OR 1.926, 95% CI 1.017-3.645, P = 0.044). Cold seasons were associated with lower mortality during MV (OR 0.752, 95% CI 0.572-0.987, P = 0.040). Additionally, there was a marginal association between cold seasons and carbapenem use (P = 0.07), a class of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Notably, April exhibited the highest mortality during MV, coinciding with a change in physician staffing, with a median turnover of 27.1% among all the house staff. Neither the pandemic era (OR 1.059, 95% CI 0.801-1.400, P = 0.689) nor SARS-CoV-2 positivity (OR 1.211, 95% CI 0.525-2.793, P = 0.654) was found to be associated with mortality. Conclusions As to the primary objectives, we identified ventilator-associated condition, the first of three tiers of VAE, as a risk factor for mortality during MV. Regarding the secondary objectives, we found that the COVID-19 pandemic and SARS-CoV-2 positivity were not associated with mortality during MV. Meanwhile, mortality during MV was associated with seasonal factors; however, whether antimicrobial prescribing patterns or physician turnover contributed requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.