Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460208›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Successful Latissimus Dorsi Flap Reconstruction Following Intraoperative Division of the Thoracodorsal Pedicle During Breast Cancer Surgery: A Case Report.

Aditya S S N Kalyan Kondeti, Balasubramanian Venkitaraman, Suhaildeen Kajamohideen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aditya S S N Kalyan KondetiSurgical Oncology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Balasubramanian VenkitaramanSurgical Oncology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Suhaildeen KajamohideenSurgical Oncology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latissimus dorsi (LD) musculocutaneous flap remains a reliable option for breast and chest wall reconstruction because of its consistent anatomy and dependable vascularity. The flap is traditionally considered dependent on the thoracodorsal vascular pedicle, and division of this pedicle is often regarded as a contraindication to its use. We report the case of a 53-year-old woman with locally advanced right breast carcinoma who underwent modified radical mastectomy following neoadjuvant systemic therapy. During axillary dissection, the thoracodorsal vessels were intentionally ligated and divided because of dense adherence to metastatic lymph nodes, whereas the angular branch and multiple intercostal and lumbar perforators were preserved. Given the extensive postmastectomy defect, reconstruction using an LD flap was considered. Intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) angiography demonstrated satisfactory flap perfusion despite division of the dominant pedicle, allowing successful flap inset. The postoperative course was uneventful, with only minimal marginal flap necrosis that resolved with conservative management and without the need for additional surgical intervention. This case demonstrates that thoracodorsal pedicle division does not necessarily preclude successful LD flap reconstruction when collateral vascular pathways are preserved. Intraoperative ICG angiography provides valuable real-time assessment of flap perfusion and may facilitate safe reconstructive decision-making in challenging oncologic situations.

Indexed as

breast reconstructionindocyanine green angiographylatissimus dorsi flapsegmental perforatorsthoracodorsal artery

Identifiers

PMID42460208
PMCPMC13372286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.