ArticleCureus2026
Melasma Flaring and Unmasking After Treatment With a 1,927-nm Non-ablative Fractional Thulium Fiber Laser.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 1,927-nm non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) has been used as an adjuvant treatment for melasma, though most studies show only temporary improvement. We evaluated the frequency of melasma exacerbations in patients with and without a history of melasma who were treated with a 1,927-nm NAFL for photorejuvenation. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a descriptive case series based on a retrospective review of patients who received 1,927-nm NAFL (Fraxel Dual) at a dermatology practice in San Juan, Puerto Rico, from June 2018 to June 2023. Charts were examined for prior melasma history, development of new or worsening hyperpigmentation, and the interval between laser exposure and onset of pigmentation changes. Melasma flaring was defined as worsening of preexisting melasma or extension into previously unaffected areas. In contrast, unmasking was defined as new-onset melasma in patients without a prior history of the condition who developed it following laser exposure.
resultsAmong 116 individuals treated with the 1,927-nm NAFL, 13 patients (11%) developed post-treatment melasma flaring or unmasking. All affected patients were Hispanic women with a mean age of 47 years. Fitzpatrick phototypes included type III in five patients (38%) and type IV in eight patients (62%). The mean time to onset was 13 months for flaring and 17 months for unmasking following NAFL treatment.
conclusionsLasers that generate dermal heat, including the 1,927-nm NAFL, may precipitate or aggravate melasma in predisposed individuals. Caution is warranted when selecting patients with known risk factors, including Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV and substantial environmental heat and sun exposure. Limitations include retrospective design and a lack of objective severity measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.