ArticleCureus2026
Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Benign Achillodynia: A Single Center Experience With Prospective Follow-Up.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) for refractory achillodynia and to examine whether pain response differs by pretreatment pain duration or common dose and fractionation schedules. Methods Consecutive patients treated for Achilles tendinopathy at a single institution between 2020 and January 2026 were identified and contacted in early 2026 for updated outcome and toxicity assessment. Pain was assessed using a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) before radiotherapy and during follow-up. Treatments were delivered two to three times weekly according to German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)-consistent schedules. Response, paired VAS change, toxicity, and subgroup differences were analyzed. Results Seventy-one patients received radiotherapy for 81 treated feet, including 10 bilaterally treated patients. Median baseline VAS was 7, and most patients had undergone prior conservative therapies. The most common schedule was 6 × 1 Gy. At a median follow-up of 3 months after the last radiotherapy course, 79% (n = 64) of feet responded, 13.6% (n = 11) did not respond, and 7.4% (n = 6) were lost to follow-up. Among 61 feet with paired VAS data, the median pain improvement was 4 points. No increased pain or treatment-related toxicity was reported. Pain improvement did not significantly differ by pain duration of ≤12 versus >12 months or by 6 × 1 Gy versus 8 × 0.5 Gy. Conclusion LDRT provided meaningful pain relief without observed toxicity in this real-world cohort. These findings support LDRT as a potential option after failed, contraindicated, or poorly tolerated conservative treatment with an effect size similar to what has been reported for fasciopathies in randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.