ArticleDigital health
Insomnia severity modifies diary-based sleep-continuity and sleep-initiation associations with next-day daytime HRV in a real-world wearable dataset.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined whether baseline insomnia severity modifies within-person associations of diary-based sleep-continuity and sleep-initiation metrics with next-day daytime heart rate variability (HRV) in a wearable-based dataset. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a publicly available dataset combining daily sleep diaries with wearable-derived HRV over 4 weeks. The analytic dataset was constructed from the publicly released raw files. Daytime heart rate variability (HRV) was aggregated from eligible 5-minute windows recorded between 09:00 and 23:00, and the primary outcome was daytime RMSSD on the natural log scale. Sleep efficiency was operationalized using a Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD)-style definition that explicitly incorporated wake after sleep onset (WASO). Within-person associations were estimated using participant fixed-effects linear models with standard errors clustered at the participant level. Effect modification was tested using sleep metric × baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), mean-centered, interaction terms. All analyses were restricted to observations meeting prespecified coverage thresholds and day-level complete-case criteria. Results: The analytic dataset comprised 1,372 diary-days from 49 participants. The primary sleep-efficiency model included 451 person-days from 39 participants. Baseline insomnia symptoms were largely non-severe, and no participant met criteria for severe baseline insomnia. The CSD-style sleep efficiency × baseline ISI interaction was positive (β=0.0060; 95% CI, 0.0023 to 0.0097; P=0.002), and the sleep latency × baseline ISI interaction was negative (β=-0.0034; 95% CI, -0.0051 to -0.0018; P<0.001). Interactions involving WASO and CSD-style sleep duration were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Baseline insomnia symptom burden modified the associations of diary-based sleep efficiency and sleep latency with daytime RMSSD. The findings support symptom-dependent sleep-HRV coupling in a predominantly healthy cohort, but higher-ISI estimates were based on few participants in the moderate-ISI range and on person-days meeting daytime HRV coverage criteria. These findings should not be extrapolated to populations with severe or clinically diagnosed insomnia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.