ArticleMedComm2026
Deep Learning Predicts Imminent Tumor Progression in Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using Serial CT Scans During Chemotherapy.
Article in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) often progresses rapidly during chemotherapy despite initial assessments of stable disease or partial response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), underscoring the limitations of the current methods for predicting short-term progressive disease (PD). To address this, the study developed a spatiotemporal deep learning framework that integrates convolutional and long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks to dynamically predict PD at the next follow-up visit using serial computed tomography (CT) scans and baseline clinical variables. The model was trained on a retrospective cohort of 243 patients (415 predicted events, defined as temporal sequences for the next follow-up PD prediction) and evaluated across internal, external, and prospective cohorts. The model achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.77, 0.76, and 0.74, respectively. Performance remained robust across chemotherapy regimens (AG or Gemcitabine-based, FOLFIRINOX, and SOXIRI; AUC 0.68-0.79), PD subtypes (target lesion growth vs. new metastases; AUC 0.72 vs. 0.77), and baseline disease stages (locally advanced vs. metastatic; AUC 0.85 vs. 0.71). This framework enables the noninvasive, real-time prediction of imminent PD in advanced PDAC, facilitating timely treatment modification. Its validated generalizability and reliance on routine clinical data underscore its potential for seamless integration into chemotherapy management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.