ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Improving fidelity of implementation of self-administered pulse oximetry and remote patient monitoring in Honduras during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Honduras' Secretariat of Health was eager to understand whether self-administered pulse oximetry could improve clinical outcomes of high-risk COVID-19 patients. While these interventions show promise for expanding healthcare access in lower- and middle-income countries, evidence about contextual implementation fidelity and effectiveness remains limited. We conducted a retrospective fidelity of implementation analysis of phone-based patient monitoring with or without self-administered pulse oximetry in Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela, Honduras. Using Carroll's Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity, we analyzed adherence (content, coverage, frequency, duration), delivery quality, participant responsiveness, and implementation strategies through trial data, acceptability assessments, and implementation documentation. The intervention achieved high fidelity: 98.9% coverage (1,821/1,841 eligible patients), 97.7% daily monitoring call completion, and 97.7% pulse oximeter utilization. Implementation strategies included culturally-adapted education materials, communication styles tailored to participants, and multi-disciplinary team engagement. Participant satisfaction was 99.2%, with minimal withdrawal (0.3%) and loss to follow-up (2.0%). However, only 28% of participants sought additional care when referred for warning signs. Unexpected benefits included reported positive impacts on participants' mental health during isolation. This analysis demonstrates that remote patient monitoring and self-administered pulse oximetry implementation can achieve high fidelity in a lower-middle-income setting, including during a health emergency and where such interventions are novel. This challenges concerns about technology access and adoption in resource-limited environments. Future research should focus on hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials and strategies to improve referral adherence. These findings suggest that expanding implementation of these approaches may enhance healthcare access during emergencies and routine circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.