Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460057›Full record

ReviewCampbell systematic reviews2026

PROTOCOL: Measures of Parenting Constructs Utilised With Indigenous Caregivers in Canada, Australia, Aotearoa, and the United States: A Scoping Review Protocol.

Alexandra Gregory, Kim M Caudwell, Chelsea Wesner, Leeann Mick-Ramsamy, Sara Filoche, Emily Armstrong, Gary Robinson, Kayli Wild

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Campbell systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra GregoryMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Kim M CaudwellFaculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Chelsea WesnerCenters for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Leeann Mick-RamsamyFirst Nations Indigenous Health and Research Consultant and member of First Nations Reference Group for Child and Maternal Health, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Sara FilocheDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Emily ArmstrongMolly Wardaguga Institute for First Nations Birth Rights, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Gary RobinsonMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Kayli WildMolly Wardaguga Institute for First Nations Birth Rights, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures of parenting constructs that are suited to sample and context are necessary in the development of evidence for models of family support. As parenting practices and values vary across history and cultures, it is important to consider the validity of measures of parenting for Indigenous families. This protocol outlines a scoping review that will seek to describe the scope of measures of parenting constructs that have been utilised with Indigenous families in comparative contexts of Canada, Australia, Aotearoa, and the United States, and describe the characteristics of new and adapted measures. Data extracted from articles will describe the parenting construct being measured, the sample involved in the study, the process for development or adaptation, how Indigenous leadership and perspectives have been included in measure design, and the psychometric qualities of measures. The scoping review will employ the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, with data extraction drawing on aspects of the COSMIN and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool. Findings will be aligned with the cultural continuum of measure adaptation and development and presented in table and narrative formats. Findings will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed academic output. Conducted by a team of Indigenous and allied scholars, the scoping review aims to capture a snapshot of existing measures, identifying for practitioners and researchers measurement approaches that embed strengths-based perspectives and Indigenous knowledges of parenting.

Indexed as

Indigenous parentsmeasure developmentpsychometric validation

Identifiers

PMID42460057
PMCPMC13369379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.