ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2026
Unlocking the Hidden Value of Evaluation Reports: A Semi-Automated Workflow to Inform Strategic Planning and Monitoring of SDG Progress Within UNICEF.
Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evaluation reports contain critical, practice-based evidence relevant to policy and strategic decision-making, particularly for monitoring progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, limited discoverability, richness of information content, and structure can act as barriers to their use in literature analyses, especially compared to peer-reviewed literature. This paper addresses the challenge of discovering evaluation reports for synthesis through a scalable, semi-automated methodology. Methodology: We present a pipeline to process and map information from 631 publicly available UNICEF evaluation reports. It includes PDF-to-text conversion, document parsing, neural network-based sentence mining and outcome-specific filtering using adjacency-query search in SWIFT-Review. The target framework was UNICEF's 2022-2025 Strategic Plan, encompassing 64 defined outcomes. Tools we used were free and methods we developed are open-source. Results: The approach achieved a 92% reduction in overall text volume and good recall (0.93) in identifying relevant sentences. A median search precision of 0.6 was achieved across outcomes, requiring an average review of only 21 evaluation reports per outcome to extract insights. These results indicate a potential to increase feasibility of discovering high-quality information from evaluation reports, although efficiency might vary when applied to other datasets. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that evaluation reports - despite their structural heterogeneity - can be systematically searched, extracted, and mapped. This work highlights the untapped value of evaluation reports for evidence-based planning and offers a replicable approach for researchers working at the intersection of development research, policy, and artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.