ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Minimal-access Nipple-sparing Mastectomy With Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrix or Synthetic Mesh.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimal-access nipple-sparing mastectomy (MA-NSM), endoscopic-assisted NSM, or robotic-assisted NSM with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DTIBR) is increasingly performed due to its small and inconspicuous scars and improved aesthetic results. MA-NSM with prepectoral implant placement without acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or synthetic mesh may offer acceptable outcomes with reduced costs. This study reports the preliminary results of these procedures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent MA-NSM with prepectoral DTIBR without ADM or synthetic mesh between January and September 2024 using a prospectively maintained database. The clinical results, complications, and patient-reported outcome measurements were analyzed. Results: Twelve patients underwent 14 MA-NSM procedures with prepectoral DTIBR without ADM or synthetic mesh. The median age was 49 years, and 84.6% were early-stage (stage 0-II) breast cancer patients. The mean operative time per breast was 193 ± 43 minutes. The median mastectomy specimen weight was 262.9 g, and the median implant size was 275 mL. There were no major complications such as implant loss or return to theater. Seroma formation requiring multiple aspirations was the most observed event (42.9%). All the patients were satisfied with the aesthetic results. Conclusions: In the current preliminary study, MA-NSM with prepectoral DTIBR without ADM or synthetic mesh was a feasible procedure and yielded satisfactory aesthetic results. However, more cases and longer follow-up periods are required to ensure long-term safety in future clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.