SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2026
Exploring an AI-driven dynamic triage system for real-time patient risk reassessment in emergency departments in low-resource settings.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a global challenge, particularly acute in low-resource settings, where staff and equipment shortages exacerbate inefficiencies. Conventional triage systems are static and often fail to detect patient deterioration after the initial assessment. This study aims to explore the potential of AI-driven dynamic triage systems for continuous reassessment of patient risk in low-resource EDs. Methods: A narrative review was conducted through a literature search from 2014 to 2025, following a structured selection process using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ResearchGate, synthesizing evidence on conventional triage models, AI- based decision support, and machine learning applications in emergency care. Results: This study shows that the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) achieves a pooled sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 70.5-81.7 for predicting short-term mortality and ICU admissions; yet, under-triage rates in LMICs reach 25%-30%. AI-driven models, including logistic regression, random forests, gradient boosting, and LSTM networks, demonstrate superior predictive accuracy, reducing prioritization errors by up to 9% and improving detection of high-risk patients. Pilot programs in LMICs confirm the feasibility of mobile and cloud-based AI tools, though challenges remain in data quality, infrastructure, and clinician trust. Conclusion: AI-enabled dynamic triage offers promise for enhancing patient safety, optimizing resource allocation, and reducing mortality in overcrowded EDs. However, successful implementation requires prospective validation, infrastructure investment, and co-design with clinicians to ensure adaptability in low-resource settings
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.