Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459987›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2026

Can Systematic Drift Rate Variability Replace Random Variability in the Diffusion Decision Model?

Jie Sun, Daniel Feuerriegel, Adam F Osth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie SunMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Daniel FeuerriegelMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Adam F OsthMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The full diffusion decision model (DDM) assumes that the rate of evidence accumulation varies across trials, which allows the model to account for slow errors and asymptotic accuracy. This across-trial drift rate variability, however, has been criticised for being difficult to estimate and ad hoc. To examine whether random drift rate variability corresponds to meaningful variations in the quality of decision evidence, we assessed whether the model-estimated drift rate variability parameter can be partitioned by trial-level systematic drift rate information. Using a large recognition memory dataset with electroencephalography (EEG) recordings ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42113-026-00264-0.

Indexed as

Across-Trial drift rate variabilityDecision-MakingDiffusion decision modelEEGRecognition memory

Identifiers

PMID42459987
PMCPMC13293026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.