ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Acute postoperative spinal epidural hematoma following unilateral biportal endoscopic.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To report a rare case of acute postoperative epidural hematoma (PEDH) following unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression (ULBD) for L3-4 spinal stenosis, presumably caused by muscular hemorrhage, and to explore its potential etiology through a review of the literature. Methods: The clinical data, including pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, were recorded at key timepoints: preoperatively, pre-surgical drain removal, post-surgical drain removal, and post-emergency debridement. A literature review was conducted to contextualize the findings. Results: A 56-year-old male presented with left lower limb pain (VAS 6), intermittent claudication (walking distance: 100 meters), and a JOA score of 10 preoperatively. After undergoing the UBE-ULBD surgery at the L3-4 level, the patient reported significant relief of lower limb neurological symptoms upon regaining consciousness from anesthesia. However, three minutes after drain removal on the 24th hour postoperatively, the patient experienced sudden severe left lower limb pain (VAS 10), which was refractory to routine analgesics. Administration of morphine provided only partial relief (VAS 7). Physical examination disclosed localized swelling at the surgical site, and subsequent MRI imaging confirmed the presence of hematoma signals within the operative channel. Emergency debridement revealed continuous bleeding from a small muscular artery within the operative tract, which had led to hematoma accumulation and subsequent compression of the dural sac and nerve roots. The bleeding artery was successfully ligated, and the hematoma was meticulously evacuated. Following debridement, the patient's pain improved significantly (VAS 3), and he was discharged without any sequelae. Conclusion: Spinal postoperative epidural hematomas have been reported in 0.1%-3% of cases, however, this represents the first documented instance following UBE-ULBD surgery. Hemorrhage from the muscular layer is identified as a potential etiology, underscoring the necessity for meticulous intraoperative hemostasis, particularly after restoration of baseline blood pressure prior to wound closure. Routine placement of a drainage tube is therefore recommended. Immediate surgical intervention, preferably within 24 h, is crucial for alleviating neurological compression, as emphasized by expert consensus, and significantly improves functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.