Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459942›Full record

ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2026

T

Masayoshi Takamori, Hiroshi Irisawa, Yoshiteru Seo, Takashi Mizushima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masayoshi TakamoriDepartment of Rehabilitation, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Japan.
Hiroshi IrisawaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Japan.
Yoshiteru SeoDivision of Cell Structure, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Takashi MizushimaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Upper-limb weakness significantly impairs activities of daily living in individuals with neurological disorders. Exercise at the anaerobic threshold or higher is recommended for efficient training and rehabilitation in such cases. Given a lack of standardized, non-invasive methods to assess the anaerobic threshold for small muscles in clinical practice, we used T Methods: T Results: In the horizontal direction exercise, the sensitivity values and CFZ of four out of five agonist muscles did not increase, nor shift, showing that these muscles were contracted by the aerobic metabolism. In the vertical direction exercise, in four of five agonist muscles and in two synergist muscles, the sensitivity values increased to about 50% and the CFZ was shifted to the right, indicating that these muscles were contracted by the anaerobic metabolism. Conclusions: Vertical direction exercise without extra weight can provide a minimum exercise strength that is higher than the anaerobic threshold. T

Indexed as

exercise strengthkinesiologymagnetic resonance imagingnon-invasive methodtransverse relaxation time

Identifiers

PMID42459942
PMCPMC13369466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.