SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Experimental evidence of electroacupuncture in ALS mouse models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and to elucidate the underlying neurobiological mechanisms by synthesizing preclinical evidence. Methods: According to the PICOS principle, relevant studies were searched in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CNKI. Search terms and strategies were determined based on MeSH terms. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the SYRCLE's Risk of Bias tool and the CAMARADES checklist. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 and Rstudio software. Results: Seventeen studies involving 372 animals were included. The quality scores of the included studies ranged from 5 to 8, with an average score of 7. The meta-analysis of the primary outcome, the rotarod test score, showed a significant improvement in the EA group compared to the control group [SMD = 3.31, 95% CI (2.05, 4.57), Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that EA confers significant neuroprotective benefits in preclinical ALS models, primarily through multi-target modulation of key pathological processes such as neuroinflammation, aberrant cell death signaling, and RNA metabolism. These preclinical findings underscore the potential of electroacupuncture as a complementary neuroprotective strategy and warrant further investigation in rigorous clinical trials. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251229183.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.