ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Cognitive impairment in Chinese patients with isolated generalized dystonia: a case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have indicated that non-motor symptoms are primary problems in focal dystonia, but limited data are available about cognitive function and their correlation with motor severity in generalized dystonia (GD). Methods: In the present study, we performed a case-control study and enrolled isolated genetic or idiopathic GD patients and age-, sex- and education-matched healthy controls (HC). Clinical characteristics, motor symptoms, psychiatric symptoms, and cognitive performance were assessed in both groups using various standardized rating scales and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Group comparisons, multiple linear regression analyses, and correlation analyses were performed, with adjustment for demographic and affective variables and correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Twenty patients with GD and matched healthy controls were enrolled and completed the assessments. Compared with HC, GD patients showed mild impairments, particularly in MoCA, executive function/attention, spatial ability, some tests in memory and similarities while other cognitive function did not differ between patients and HC. After adjustment and multiple comparison correction, MOCA, MOCA, executive function/attention and episodic memory remained the most consistent deficits. Several other cognitive differences were no longer significant after correction. No significant associations were found between cognitive performance and motor severity or disease duration. Cognitive performance did not differ between genetic and idiopathic subgroups or between medication groups. Conclusion: GD is associated with mild and heterogeneous cognitive impairments, with only a subset of deficits remaining robust after adjustment. Cognitive performance appears largely independent of motor severity, disease duration, medication use, and disease etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.