Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

A structured music-based intervention for motor rehabilitation and exploratory cognitive and quality-of-life outcomes after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized waitlist-controlled intervention study.

Aída Estévez, Miguel Ángel Pérez Nieto, Laura Herrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aída EstévezFaculty of Health Sciences - HM Hospitals, University Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Pérez NietoFaculty of Health Sciences - HM Hospitals, University Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.
Laura HerreroFaculty of Health Sciences - HM Hospitals, University Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke is one of the leading causes of long-term disability and is frequently associated with persistent motor, cognitive, emotional, and social sequelae that affect autonomy and quality of life. Music-based interventions have shown potential benefits in post-stroke rehabilitation, particularly through rhythmic auditory stimulation, structured instrumental practice, and active musical engagement. These approaches may support motor coordination and motivation and may also contribute to emotional regulation, social interaction, and perceived quality of life. However, evidence remains limited regarding structured music-based interventions that integrate motor activities with broader cognitive and psychosocial components into post-stroke rehabilitation. This randomized waitlist-controlled intervention study aims to evaluate the effects of a structured music-based intervention on motor function after stroke, with executive functioning and stroke-specific quality of life being examined as exploratory outcomes. Methods: A prospective, phased, randomized waitlist-controlled intervention study will include adults aged 18-70 years who have experienced a stroke at least 3 months before enrollment. The first recruitment phase will be conducted in a single outpatient neurological rehabilitation center in the Community of Madrid, Spain, with subsequent recruitment phases planned at additional outpatient neurological rehabilitation centers within the Community of Madrid until the required sample size is achieved. Two groups will be formed: an experimental group receiving standard rehabilitation care plus a structured music-based intervention consisting of 10 sessions and a waitlist group receiving only standard rehabilitation care during this period, followed by the structured music-based intervention. Assessments will be carried out at week 0 (baseline), week 5 (post-intervention), and week 10 (after group crossover), with an additional follow-up at 3 months. The primary outcome will be motor function. Upper-limb motor function will be assessed as a secondary motor outcome, while executive functioning and stroke-specific quality of life will be examined as exploratory outcomes. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle, with additional analyses conducted for participants completing at least 80% of sessions. A linear mixed-effects model will be used to estimate the main effect of the intervention on the primary motor outcome, with additional secondary and exploratory models performed for upper-limb motor function, executive functioning, and stroke-specific quality of life. The model will include time, group, and the interaction between group and time as fixed effects, with time since stroke included as a covariate. Additional analyses will be conducted using intraclass correlation coefficients to explore the agreement between participant and family member reports of executive function. Discussion: This protocol will evaluate a structured music-based intervention as a complement to standard rehabilitation care, with a primary focus on motor rehabilitation. Exploratory analyses will examine whether the intervention is associated with changes in executive functioning and stroke-specific quality of life. The study is expected to provide preliminary evidence on the feasibility and potential effects of this integrative music-based intervention within post-stroke rehabilitation and to contribute to the development of multidomain rehabilitation approaches. The findings may inform the design of future studies and the potential implementation of music-based interventions in post-stroke rehabilitation settings. Study protocol preregistration: https://osf.io/hqruw.

Indexed as

executive functionsmotor functionsmotor rehabilitationmusic-based interventionquality of lifestrokewaitlist-controlled intervention

Identifiers

PMID42459852
PMCPMC13368994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.