ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Clinical and enzymatic evaluation of the effect of dietary vitamin C on orthodontic tooth movement.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim and objectives: To evaluate the effect of dietary vitamin C supplementation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement during canine retraction by comparing individuals receiving supplementation with those who are not. Additionally, to analyze changes in selected enzymatic biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). Materials and methods: This study included 28 patients who underwent orthodontic treatment followed by first premolar extraction and levelling. Participants were divided into two groups: Group I received dietary vitamin C supplementation (500 mg chewable tablets), while Group II served as controls without supplementation. Canine retraction was carried out using NiTi closed coil springs delivering 150 g force with absolute anchorage provided by mini-implants, and digital scans were recorded at R0(before retraction) and R1(75 days). The rate of canine retraction was calculated as the distance moved per time. GCF was collected at baseline (T0), before retraction (T1), and after 75 days (T2) and analyzed for alkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatase levels using ELISA. Results: The vitamin C group demonstrated significantly greater maxillary canine retraction compared to controls, with mean values of (3.20 ± 0.84 mm) vs. (1.96 ± 0.60 mm) in males and (2.86 ± 0.38 mm) vs. (1.73 ± 0.31 mm) in females. Alkaline phosphatase and Acid phosphatase levels increased significantly over time in both groups, with a greater rise in the vitamin C group. Conclusion: Dietary vitamin C supplementation significantly accelerated canine retraction and enhanced bone remodeling enzyme activity during orthodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.