ArticleDusunen adam : Bakirkoy Ruh ve Sinir Hastaliklari Hastanesi yayin organi2026
The psychometric validity and reliability of the DSM-5 Severity Measure for Social Anxiety Disorder in a Turkish adult clinical population.
Article in Dusunen adam : Bakirkoy Ruh ve Sinir Hastaliklari Hastanesi yayin organi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Metacognition and Mindfulness Across Social Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder and Healthy Controls.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Severity Measure for Social Anxiety Disorder-Adult (DSM-5 SAD-S) in a Turkish-speaking clinical population. Specifically, we assessed its factorial structure, internal consistency, and convergent and known-group validity. Method: The sample included 146 participants (73 diagnosed with social anxiety disorder and 73 healthy controls). All participants completed the DSM-5 SAD-S and the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted using minimum residual extraction with oblimin rotation. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation, was performed to evaluate model fit. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Convergent validity was examined through Pearson correlation with LSAS scores. Known-group validity was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: EFA supported a unidimensional structure with strong factor loadings (0.561-0.849). CFA indicated acceptable model fit (Comparative Fit Index [CFI]=0.990; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI]=0.988; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA]=0.106; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual [SRMR]=0.084). Internal consistency was high (α=0.91). The DSM-5 SAD-S score showed a moderate and statistically significant correlation with the LSAS total score (r=0.39, p<0.001). Patients scored significantly higher than controls (t=18.4, p<0.001), supporting known-group validity. Conclusion: The Turkish adult version of the DSM-5 SAD-S demonstrates strong psychometric properties and is suitable for use in both clinical practice and research to assess the severity of social anxiety symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.