ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Health economic evaluation of left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk for stroke and bleeding: a study protocol.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03463317 (Left Atrial Appendage CLOSURE in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation at High Risk of Stroke and Bleeding Compared to Medical Therapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Left Atrial Appendage CLOSURE in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation at High Risk of Stroke and Bleeding Compared to Medical Therapy: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. The associated risk of stroke can be effectively reduced by oral anticoagulation; however, these increase bleeding risk or can even be contraindicated. Clinical studies indicate that percutaneous catheter-based left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may represent an effective alternative for stroke prevention in this high-risk patient group. While the clinical and economic benefits of LAAC have been compared with standard drug therapy indirectly, direct comparisons are lacking, especially for patients with AF at high risk of stroke and bleeding. EvaClosure, a substudy of the CLOSURE-AF-DZHK16 trial, was designed to describe current therapy paths of patients with AF and high risk of stroke and bleeding, while quantifying resource utilization and healthcare costs. Moreover, this study aims to evaluate the health economic impact of LAAC in patients with high risk of stroke and bleeding, compared with the best physician-directed medical therapy (including direct oral anticoagulants when eligible). Methods: Data gathered in CLOSURE-AF address the effect of different treatment options on health-related quality of life; analyses of resource utilization and healthcare costs are based on claims data from a German statutory health insurance (SHI) provider. Economic information derived from SHI data is complemented by a validated resource use measurement instrument capturing non-medical and indirect costs. The cost-utility analysis uses a Markov model, for which parameters are quantified from statistically matched SHI claims and CLOSURE-AF clinical study data, supplemented by data from the literature. Discussion: The combination of these databases allows a comprehensive, valid, and policy-relevant assessment of costs and benefits related to LAAC. Moreover, the advantages of the different databases are used for health economic evaluation. The results of this study are expected to generate robust evidence to inform health economic evaluations and provide valuable insights for SHI providers and policymakers on the societal and economic impact of LAAC. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT03463317. The clinical study CLOSURE-AF-DZHK16, including the substudy EvaClosure, was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (Identifier: NCT03463317, Posted: March 13, 2018, Update: July 30, 2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.