Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459736›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Good to the Last Drop? Nectar Depletion by Insect Pollinators Varies Among Plant Species and Through Time.

Skylar H Gillies, Douglas B Sponsler, Zachary J Hackworth, Darin J McNeil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Skylar H GilliesDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0799-7869
Douglas B SponslerBoys' Latin of Philadelphia Charter School Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Zachary J HackworthDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA.
Darin J McNeilDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-8354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most insect pollinator species use floral resources exploited by many conspecifics and heterospecifics. In systems where floral resources limit pollinator populations and give rise to competition, understanding whether competition varies across the growing season is a fundamental question in explaining how species co-exist and how communities are structured. Recent work on nectar depletion rates in plant-pollinator communities has demonstrated the value of measuring nectar depletion rates as a proxy for competition among pollinators. One hypothesis on pollinator competition, hereafter, "equilibrium hypothesis," predicts that nectar depletion rates should be constant across the growing season within a given community. In contrast, an alternative hypothesis, hereafter, "dynamic hypothesis" suggests the opposite. To test these hypotheses, we sampled nectar depletion and floral abundance across an early successional plant community over the bulk of a growing season in central Kentucky, USA in spring/summer, 2023. We predicted that a dynamic ecosystem such as that studied here would most likely be characterized by dynamic depletion rates. Initially in the growing season, nectar depletion rates within this early successional vegetation community were moderate (e.g., 50%-70%) but steadily climbed to 85% as the growing season advanced. Plant species varied widely in depletion rate: invasive

Indexed as

beesbutterfliesfloral resourcesinvasive plantsnative plantsnectar production

Identifiers

PMID42459736
PMCPMC13368463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.