Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459645›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Lactylation and macrophage polarization from a clinical perspective: pathological mechanisms and therapeutic potential.

Chenfei Ma, Jinyan Han, Yu Tian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chenfei MaDepartment of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Jinyan HanDepartment of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yu TianDepartment of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an emerging epigenetic modification, lactylation has attracted increasing attention in studies of macrophage activation in recent years. Accumulating evidence indicates that lactylation not only regulates macrophage gene-expression programs and polarization trajectories, but also contributes to the pathogenesis and prognosis of a wide range of diseases. In this review, we summarize fundamental concepts related to lactate metabolism and protein lactylation, and we discuss how lactylation shapes macrophage function and plasticity, with particular emphasis on its mechanistic roles under distinct pathophysiological conditions. In addition, we examine the regulatory networks through which lactylation modulates macrophage polarization and highlight its potential translational applications in clinical intervention. Collectively, this review aims to provide updated insights and therapeutic perspectives to support disease prevention, delay progression, and improve patient outcomes. We also emphasize the limitations of causal inference in current studies, contextualize the classical M1/M2 nomenclature, and synthesize how lactate flux, microenvironmental cues, thresholds of lactylation, and writer/eraser/reader balance may determine divergent disease outcomes.

Indexed as

Lactic AcidMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAnimalsHumansLactic Acidlactylationmacrophage polarizationpathological mechanismpost-translational modificationtherapeutic strategy

Identifiers

PMID42459645
PMCPMC13368559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.