Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459558›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2026

Root cause discovery via permutations and Cholesky decomposition.

Jinzhou Li, Benjamin B Chu, Ines F Scheller, Julien Gagneur, Marloes H Maathuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinzhou LiDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-4104
Benjamin B ChuDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8342-2361
Ines F SchellerSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Julien GagneurSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8924-8365
Marloes H MaathuisSeminar for Statistics, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work is motivated by the following problem: Can we identify the disease-causing gene in a patient affected by a monogenic disorder? This problem is an instance of root cause discovery. Specifically, we aim to identify the intervened variable in one interventional sample using a set of observational samples as reference. We consider a linear structural equation model where the causal ordering is unknown. We begin by examining a simple method that uses squared z-scores and characterize the conditions under which this method succeeds and fails, showing it generally cannot identify the root cause. We then prove, without additional assumptions, that the root cause is identifiable even if the causal ordering is not. Two key ingredients of this identifiability result are the use of permutations and the Cholesky decomposition, which allow us to exploit an invariant property across different permutations to discover the root cause. Furthermore, we characterize permutations that yield the correct root cause and, based on this, propose a valid method for root cause discovery. We also adapt this approach to high-dimensional settings. Finally, we evaluate our methods through simulations and apply the high-dimensional method to discover disease-causing genes in the gene expression dataset that motivates this work.

Indexed as

Cholesky decompositionidentifiabilityinvariancepermutationrare disease applicationroot cause discovery

Identifiers

PMID42459558
PMCPMC13370348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.