Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459552›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2025

Explaining Human Comparisons Using Alignment-Importance Heatmaps.

Nhut Truong, Dario Pesenti, Uri Hasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nhut TruongCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Trento 38068 Italy.
Dario PesentiCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Trento 38068 Italy.
Uri HassonCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Trento 38068 Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8530-5051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a computational explainability approach for human comparison tasks, using Alignment Importance Score (AIS) heatmaps derived from deep-vision models. The AIS reflects a feature map's unique contribution to the alignment between deep neural network's (DNN) representational geometry and that of humans. We first validate the AIS by showing that the prediction of out-of-sample human similarity judgments is improved when constructing representations using only higher-scoring AIS feature maps identified from a training set. We then compute image-specific heatmaps that visually indicate the areas that correspond to feature maps with higher AIS scores. These maps provide an intuitive explanation of which image areas are more important when it is compared to other images in a cohort. We observe a correspondence between these heatmaps and saliency maps produced by a gaze-prediction model. However, in some cases, meaningful differences emerge, as the dimensions relevant for comparison are not necessarily the most visually salient. To conclude, Alignment Importance improves the prediction of human similarity judgments from DNN embeddings and provides interpretable insights into the relevant information in image space.

Identifiers

PMID42459552
PMCPMC13298662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.